Picture this: summer school American Literature class. You're trying to teach the Harlem Renaissance, and after you've talked about jazz, jazz poets, and all things related to a revolution in music, painting, and literature you ask if there are any questions. The hands raise. These are the hands of seniors in high school. They don't ask you about Langston Hughes or Zora Neale Hurston. They ask you what jazz is. And they ask you what country it came from.
That was last week in my American Literature course I'm teaching to "college bound" seniors. Yeah, I know. My jaw is used to dropping, but I naively thought they at least had American musical history down. Turns out they don't. They of course know nothing about classical music, but jazz? Blues? Rockabilly? Anything pre-hip hop? Hip hop even? Nope. Can most students play an instrument other than their cell phones? The wine bar was looking awfully good on my way home from school.
How has it come to this?
What Good are the Arts?
Culturally, we have a general disrespect for the arts. I should phrase that differently. We look to the arts, and music in specific, the way we look at sports: It has to have some sort of payoff. It's not enough that we Americans and our children learn an instrument or learn a sport. We have to be the best at it and monetarily successful a la Kobe Bryant or Lady Gaga. Otherwise, we deem it a waste. That's a horrible way to look at the world.
I think back to my time working in a Japanese elementary school where every kid learned an instrument and had music classes on a regular basis. It wasn't a way to build virtuosos but to make sure every child had a basic understanding of this aspect of life. What a concept. No one had to justify the arts in the curriculum it was just there.
Often I think American parents are lost in the idea of specialization so much that we forget the obvious: There is no free choice or specialization without general knowledge first helping one decide. We need our kids to have exposure to a wide range of disciplines, of live and recorded music, and to be fearless enough to sing and play an instrument for themselves.
Music Education: You May Be on Your Own
It is often left to concerned parents to piecemeal together fine arts education at many public K-12s and sometimes privates as well. So many schools are focused on the fill-in-the-bubble mentality that they forget. An earlier Parenting Squad post, The Importance of Arts Education for Children, handled much of this.
For those of us willing to pay for private instruction in music, be it performance or reading music or music appreciation, the payoff isn't supposed to be making millionaire musicians out of them any more than t-ball is going to make them all Major League Baseball players. Its really about producing well-rounded citizens that realize and respect the value and worth of musicians and artists to be no less than engineers and scientists.
My kids get instrument lessons (guitar, piano and hopefully soon, accordion) and I also signed my son up for an online music course through K12 to learn to read music. As a former indie record store employee and singer, I take care of the music appreciation myself. Friends of mine have sent their kids to all manner of musicians for instruction, from classical to the non-profit Rock School. To me, it's all good.
The True Value of Music Education
A while back on this site, a writer wrote a piece called The High Cost of Music, which created a great deal of controversy. 200+ comments from music teachers, parents and students suggest that the high cost of not having music lessons in our children's lives is ignorance of the arts — which really means ignorance of our own cultural history. All children can and should learn to read music and learn an instrument and respect the art. This makes sense. All of us should have some general knowledge acquired by being in the close proximity of experts. It is distinctively American that we assume we must either look for greatness in our children or give up hastily and onto a new "hobby."
If in the case of my own children they become musicians (be it classically trained or punk rock), I'll be happy and content with it. But it's not what I'm aiming for. If the music lessons instead yield a discerning ear, good taste, a curious nature, a kick-ass iTunes collection and the ability to gather friends round on a Friday night with guitar in hand, well then it was worth every penny. We Americans have compartmentalized music for so long that we've forgotten the role it is supposed to play. It should both comfort and challenge us, it should be spiritual and sensual (or at least it is to me). There is no cost too high for the elation music brings.
This post was included in the All Things Family blog carnival, the Carnival of Homsechooling, and A Homeschooling Carnival.






Comments
1
Thank you!
Submitted by Nikolas Sideris (not verified) on July 21, 2010 - 10:06
Acting as a counter-article, this work gives a different perspective to the one posted a few days (weeks?) ago in parenting squad!
Thank you for this and for sheding light to a very serious problem, evident all over the world and not only the States I'm afraid!
2
No cost too high??
Submitted by Guest (not verified) on July 21, 2010 - 12:25
Your post smacks of elitism. The other writer was right - for many people who are just getting by, music lessons are too expensive..
Maybe you'd be willing to pay for me and the rest of us ignorant slobs who would prefer to pay for oh, say, the rent rather than music lessons? Or maybe my priorities are just in the wrong place.
3
No cost to high - but there are options.
Submitted by Emily (not verified) on July 22, 2010 - 16:02
I agree that "there is no cost too high" for a good education. This article does a good job in articulating the benefits of music and what the purpose of music lessons is. However, I would also like to point out that you need to "pay the mos"t to get benefit from music. It also doesn't mean that if you pay someone loads of money they will do a good job teaching your child. There are good teachers who don't charge a lot, and there are terrible teachers who charge an arm and a leg.
The average cost for lessons is not a $1 a minute. Most teachers charge half of that, teachers with more experience or higher degrees might charge more. It also depends on the area of the country where you live.
Also, in response to the last commenter: No one is telling you that you should pay for music lessons when you can't pay your rent. Neither are they saying that if you don't pay a premium for music lessons you are some kind of loser. The benefits of music physically, mentally, emotionally and spiritually are documented. It's your choice to participate or not, and your ability to do so will be determined by your means to do so in some respects. Just as with any commodity or service, some can afford it, and some can't. That doesn't diminish its inherent value or factor of enjoyment. It also doesn't give you license to put down those who think its worth the money. People pay hundreds of dollars for sports enjoyment - and that not as participants. There's nothing inherently wrong with this, but let's not put down those who put just as high a value on music lessons when one is gaining so much more from them than just enjoyment!
4
One more consideration on "no cost too high"....
Submitted by Emily (not verified) on July 22, 2010 - 16:04
You also need to take into consideration that you aren't going to pay $75/hour for your 5 year old to take lessons, but if you are a college bound senior looking to major in music this is totally reasonable. "No cost too high" needs to be taken with consideration on so many levels.
5
Alternatives to "Expensive" Lessons
Submitted by Meri (not verified) on July 22, 2010 - 16:21
Here's an article I wrote on "Alternatives to "Expensive" Lessons that may be of interest:
http://clariniano.wordpress.com/2010/07/21/alternatives-to-expensive-mus...
Meri
6
Thanks Meri!
Submitted by Emily (not verified) on July 22, 2010 - 16:33
Meri - great article on options for parents/students to take lessons when they seem to be too expensive. Very comprehensive and creative!
PS - I like your website name. I happened to have used a similar one (Emily's Musical Musings) and smiled when I saw yours. :)
7
Let's keep it civil
Submitted by Lela Davidson on July 22, 2010 - 20:26
To our guest - you do have a point. We're actually working on a post with some suggestions for those on very limited budgets. Glad you're enjoying the reads.
Lela Davidson
After the Bubbly
8
Thanks, Meri
Submitted by Lela Davidson on July 22, 2010 - 20:28
Meri,
LOVE your article. Thank you for all the wonderful tips. Love to know other ways parents teach kids about music other than through lessons.
Lela Davidson
After the Bubbly
9
Carnival of Homeschooling!
Submitted by DHM (not verified) on July 27, 2010 - 10:09
This post is in the 239th Carnival of Homeschooling, history of home education edition, which now is up at The Common Room, http://tw0.us/LUJ My theme is 'the history of homeschooling in America.' It was very interesting to research and I learned some fascinating things along the way (do you know why we have age segregated classrooms in America?).
Please pay us a visit, and reciprocate in the publicity the carnival brings you by passing along the link along so others can visit as well.
Please consider other ways to spread the news about the carnival as well- the more people who visit the carnival, the more link-love you get- If you have a facebook account, you could pass on the link there (fb doesn't like tiny url links, so here's the long one: http://heartkeepercommonroom.blogspot.com/2010/07/carnival-of-homeschooling-239.html, and if you have a twitter account, please tweet!
Thanks!
10
The option that we chose was
Submitted by Julie Rains on July 29, 2010 - 13:01
The option that we chose was the public schools -- which has a great music program though sadly experienced budget cuts this year. But parents can teach kids about music (different types, history, etc .) without spending money on lessons or an instrument -- for example, you could learn about jazz without learning to play jazz.
I liked Margaret's point that learning for the sake of learning is meaningful (at least that is the point I got and which applies to many things, not just music and sports), not necessarily as a means to a profitable future.
11
When the work becomes meaningful:
Submitted by Kimberly (not verified) on August 1, 2010 - 10:01
Thank you for the important article!
What I see developing in my oldest son's character is something that a standardized test will never measure:
http://www.latimes.com/features/health/la-he-0301-brain-music-kids-20100...
Taylor is freshman in high school who has acquired a tool kit that makes his work meaningful. He not only performs, but composes and finds time to engage in normal teenage fun! Recently Taylor was sick. The one complaint out of my fifteen-year-old son’s mouth was that he was discouraged that would not be able to work at his music... it’s true.
Back in October Taylor began tackling a concerto. The process of moving from notes on a page to music was grueling, not only for him but for all the inhabitants of our home. For the piece to resemble music, he had to break the thing into sections to be played repeatedly. Whenever he made a mistake he would repeat that section… over and over, leaving notes to bounce off 1800 square feet of walls and tangle somewhere in the center of my brain.
I was relieved when the notes were at last learned, thought I would enjoy 3 to 4 melodic hours a day. Nope. The next stage was to add dynamics, which entailed playing Ravel’s ridiculously fast composition in fast motion… then slow motion and absolutely every speed in between while stopping at sections where his fingers slipped to fix each mistake three times. I pride myself a fairly patient person with broad musical appreciation but any given section of this piece taken out of its entirety is fingernails on chalkboard. So this is how it went for three months straight.
When Taylor performed Ravel’s Concerto in G Major, III. Presto:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4CuFydE9d4&feature=email
Becoming Juilliard material was never our goal. Fighting for a habit of purpose is costly in more ways than one, but we find a way. Taylor's skill serves him well and hopefully will encourage others to engage in the work of chasing a dream.
12
We choose what to do
Submitted by AKO (not verified) on September 9, 2011 - 13:55
No one is forcing you to pay for music lessons. Pay if you want, or don't no one's holding a gun to your head. I mean if you want to learn music, go for it. The benefits are obvious. If you can't afford it, go with something else. I do however support communities to work together to allow underprivileged students the opportunity to acquire instruments for school practice.
Add new comment